ACT Party against SPAM
December 19th, 2005Seems the ACT party is voting against the antispam bill, and then making ill-informed recommendations about alternative solutions.
While I do agree that spam is an international problem, defeatedly throwing our hands in the air and suffering with spam filtering software is not the answer. There’s an old (medical?) edict that I like to apply when analysing a technical fault, as it makes things easily justifiable and has the effect of ridding a lot of corporate politics. The edict goes like this:
“Prevention is always better than the cure”So, spam filtering software is the cure, yes? So what are we doing to prevent spam, so as to supersede spam filtering software?
I do agree with Mr Hide that all the proposed bill will amount to is huffing and puffing in the Beehive, it will make nowhere near the amount of difference that its supporters are optimistically predicting. Each nation having its own rules, laws and punishments for spam is stupid. The same holds true for copyright legislation. What the world needs to help clear up the internet, an international entity, are international laws.
If all but a handful of countries can sit down and all agree to the Berne Copyright Convention, which is arguably the basis of international copyright law, then all but a handful of countries can sit down and agree on international antispam legislation, with extradition clauses etc. One unified law will make things very clearcut and will make capture and prosecution of the worst spammers equally clearcut.
Instead what we’re heading towards is a mish-mash of a couple hundred seperate sets of rules, leaving thousands of loopholes. While an illogical and inefficient situation, it’s certainly better than nothing.
