Password policies
October 19th, 2006http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3833700a11275,00.html
A third of people write down their passwords? OH NO, EVERYBODY PANIC!
*sigh*
This is why restrictive password policies are dumb. Anyone who has done 5 minutes of formal UNIX study will tell you that.
The best security measure is three-way: Something you are (username), something you have (cryptocard, smartcard, token, biometrics) and something you know (rarely changed secure password), that way it doesnt matter if they’ve written down their password* because while joe hacker might have socially engineered his way into the office and found the post-it note, and he might have guessed through observation the username structure, without the “something you have” he’s still up a creek…
Consider the three-legged stool – any two legs together and you’ve got an essentially useless stool. Sure it’ll work if you balance yourself, but it’s not quite right… Get all three legs and you’ve got yourself a fully fledged stool, my friend.
*Writing down your passwords is not a bad thing. If you have a secure password that you write down using a simple offset algorithm or a simple insert algorithm, laminate it and put it in your wallet – just in case you forget it, and have it change every 6 months or so, I can tell you it’s a lot more secure than a monthly change where you simply change your password from March06 to April06, or if you’ve got a slightly more lax password policy: March01 to March02 to March03 iterively forever
I’ve read about a guy who worked for a company who required a password change every 10 days and it had to be 32 chars long and had a list of other nonsensical requirements. Restrictive password policies are dumb and decrease security!
Even better are password phrases…
